PEPS’ PE Study: Consultation Survey on Health Effects to Be Monitored as a Priority Due to Their Link to Endocrine Disruptors
As part of the 2nd National Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors, Santé publique France will launch, starting in September 2021, a consultation with experts and stakeholders in the field to identify the health effects that should be monitored for their potential link to exposure to endocrine disruptors.
Endocrine disruptors
thematic dossier
The number of molecules classified as endocrine disruptors is on the rise, and they are found everywhere in the environment. Their effects on human health are still poorly understood, but they are...
Exposure to and potential effects associated with endocrine disruptors pose significant public health challenges. These effects could largely be prevented, particularly for future generations (product substitution, regulation, remediation, recommendations, etc.), and certain targeted measures have already been implemented (ban on BPA in baby bottles, restrictions on the use of phthalates, recommendations for pregnant women).
The complexity of this issue is a source of debate, and media coverage of studies on certain substances has led the public to take up the issue. In this context, the mobilization and collaborative efforts of all stakeholders—including the government, local authorities, economic actors, associations, health and education professionals, scientists, and experts—are essential. That is why Santé publique France, in accordance with its mission to monitor exposure and health effects related to endocrine disruptors, is fully fulfilling its role and launching a broad consultation to survey a panel of participants on two fronts: scientific and societal.
Why was this study conducted, and what is its purpose?
Current monitoring of health effects linked to endocrine disruptors focuses on certain reproductive health indicators prioritized in 2015 based on the weight of evidence, using the HURGENT network of international experts [1]. Nevertheless, the scientific literature increasingly reports other effects on human health [2, 3] (neurodevelopmental disorders, metabolic diseases, thyroid disorders, etc.), and expectations from public authorities and civil society on this subject are growing.
Santé publique France is studying the relevance and feasibility of expanding the monitoring of health indicators related to endocrine disruptors. This is why a prioritization effort was launched with the PEPS’PE project (prioritization of health effects to be monitored within the framework of Santé publique France’s endocrine disruptor monitoring program), with the aim of identifying health indicators that should be prioritized for spatio-temporal monitoring by the agency, and ultimately to have indicators useful for evaluating actions. This monitoring must be conducted on a sufficiently large scale (covering all of France, including the overseas departments and regions).
Study Methodology
The proposed methodology combines available literature data with consultations with experts and stakeholders using the DELPHI consensus method. This work is part of a public health monitoring approach rather than a substance- or exposure-based approach: the aim is to track changes in a health indicator in the general population due to its suspected link to exposure to endocrine disruptors, not to characterize the effect of a specific ED product (or group of products).
Two prioritization criteria will be evaluated:
The strength of the evidence regarding the association between the health effect and exposure to EDs,
The value of establishing surveillance for this indicator, taking into account:
epidemiological relevance (severity, incidence rate),
societal concern.
To inform the agency’s planning, Santé publique France will subsequently analyze the feasibility of monitoring the health effects identified as priorities.
The Delphi Method: What Is It?
The Delphi consensus method aims to identify a convergence of opinions. Through a questionnaire, each participant reviews the opinions of others and can reconsider their own arguments and positions. All responses remain anonymous, and experts never interact directly. The Delphi method therefore proceeds in iterations. Responses are collected and summarized, then made available to the experts so they can provide further input. This process is repeated as many times as necessary until consensus is reached and/or differences of opinion are identified.
What are its advantages?
provides decision-making insights in cases where one cannot rely on either scientific certainty or regulations,
allows for remote consultation with a large number of participants,
allows for the consultation of experts and stakeholders with diverse skills, backgrounds, and areas of expertise,
guarantees participant anonymity,
helps avoid the “personality effect” (fame, charisma, leadership, etc.),
enables the expression of knowledge that is difficult to access (unpublished, for example).
Study Procedure
Participants previously selected for this survey will be interviewed using online questionnaires: one questionnaire for the scientific component and another for the societal component.
Participants will be pre-selected for certain health effects, but they will also have the option to choose the topics on which they wish to be surveyed.
Completing a questionnaire takes a maximum of 15 minutes per category of health effects. Responses will be anonymous. In accordance with the Delphi method, several rounds of questionnaires are planned with a response deadline of 3 weeks.
Who will participate in this study?
Several experts and stakeholders involved in the issue of PE have been identified to participate in this study. Two groups of participants were formed to complete each of the two questionnaires.
Group 1: national and international scientific experts (epidemiologists, toxicologists, academics, etc.) for the scientific component.
Group 2: stakeholders in the field (SNPE1, SNPE2, the Board of Directors of Santé publique France, etc.) for the societal component, excluding those participating in Group 1 as scientists and excluding central government agencies and state operators.
Please note that participants are selected to complete one or the other questionnaire, but will not be able to complete both questionnaires.
How will the results be presented?
Following this consultation, an initial report will be produced, and a public consultation will be held in 2022. Several follow-up meetings will then be organized to discuss the results and next steps.
1 Le Moal J, et al., Toward a multi-country monitoring system of reproductive health in the context of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. European Journal of Public Health, 2016. 26(1): pp. 76–83.
2 Program, U.N.E. and W.H. Organization, State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. 2012.
3 Kortenkamp A, et al., State-of-the-art assessment of endocrine disruptors. 2012, European Commission.